Connect with us

News

Fact Check always: Re-examining the reasons and how fraud on the ballot is incredibly, really uncommon within the U.S. ahead of the 2022 midterm elections.

Published

on

https://youtu.be/wbXO5821SIw

Unsubstantiated and disproved claims that the outcomes in the U.S. 2020 primary election, which saw Democrat Joe Biden conquer former U.S. leader Donald Trump was damaged by voter fraud. Remain on the internet as the nation makes to keep midterm elections in November.

This informative article is designed to give information and context about how fraud on the element of voters is an issue in the U.S. and is not a “widespread” concern, as some experts on the internet declare; however, it is made extremely difficult by safeguards in place.

A Reuters record in front of the 2020 election, with proof of exceptional voter fraud, could be read ( this link ).

Advertisement

During an appointment with Reuters, Wendy Weiser, vice leader of the Democracy Plan at New York University’s Brennan Middle for Justice (here), stated she feels that “the likelihood of fraud and misconduct is infinitesimally rare.”

Weiser pointed out the truth that there are “strong safeguards at every stage” of the voting method to guarantee its honesty.

Moreover, Thomas Hicks, commissioner of the independent and bipartisan U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC)  said that the “real likelihood of voter fraud is relatively small and for the most part is unintentional.”

Advertisement

In the event of the election in 2020, a comprehensive study by the A.P. found less than 475 cases of probable election fraud within the battleground claims of pushed in the campaign of Trump. To give context, significantly more than 3.3 million votes were cast for the presidential campaign in Arizona alone. Arizona was the state that the A.P. found had the most considerable quantity of fraud situations (198). The A.P. also did not discover any proof of a matched work. They claimed that “practically every situation was centered on an individual working alone to cast extra ballots.”

The Brennan Middle has done studies. Brennan Middle The Brennan Middle analyzed cases of fraud in the voting method (before the typical election in 2020) and discovered that voter fraud is incredibly rare.

For another instance, an examination is done by Justin Levitt, a professor at Loyola Law College and currently a Bright Home Elderly Policy Advisor for Democracy and Voting Rights ( here), discovered 31 respectable cases of voter fraud involving the years 2000 to 2014, which is a fraction of 1 billion votes ( in this ).

Advertisement

OBSTACLES TO SENDING FRAUDULENT BALLOTS

In 2020, when numerous claims needed actions to automatically send ballots or bare ballots to voters that are qualified due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Reuters debunked social media threads that informed stories of voters getting votes for former tenants at their addresses and claimed that people could fraudulently fill in a ballot as well as get a franchise to send it fraudulently by utilizing fake names

Jennifer Morrell, an election guide and former formal of the election in Utah and Colorado, believed to Reuters in May of 2020 that it is not only illegal to impersonate voters – on a ballot software or the ballot itself but to be able to take out fraud, criminals will need the essential points of a person’s data including their delivery time, as well as to be able to forge their trademark to complement that of the voter’s registry.

“Only because there is a ballot that is sent doesn’t mean that ballot is mentioned,” Hicks stated about the complete account that election officials use to examine to determine the validity of a voter’s ballot.

Advertisement

Hicks was the manager of Reuters to the movie, which outlines at length the many safety actions which can be in place, which change across claims and jurisdictions for voters that are in person or mail-in ( here ) and includes the registry of voters for qualified voters as well as verification of signatures.

It is essential to notice that the National Meeting of State Legislatures offers info on voting at home with a specific area on safety characteristics that can be in the place. The actions in spot to overcome voter fraud – which changes across claims include hand-written ballots on paper and trademark verification, as well as analyzing and controlling ballots before the election day to be able to let longer verification instances, accurate addresses, safety cameras for storage, and more (see the Security top features of voting absentee/mailed Area on Ballots)

Advertisement

The 2020 Reuters report explaining the procedure for voting-by-mail and voter verification can be obtained ( this link ).

WHAT ABOUT THE ALLEGED “EVIDENCE” OF FRAUD SHARED ONLINE?

In the lead-up to the 2020 presidential election and after the election, Reuters addressed multiple claims produced by social media customers who declared to own proof of fraud in the voting process. However, these instances offered rational explanations for the shares, including miscaptioned pictures or footage taken from context.

VOTER REGISTRATION

Old voting figures were used to guide “fraud.”In going to the “discrepancy” between voter registration figures and projections of voting for many claims, some customers falsely stated that there were more ballots mentioned than the number of people registered to vote.

Advertisement

Specific claims also enable same-day registration and Election Time registration, meaning some of these figures could rise from the most up-to-date record obtained during the time of the. The NCSL has state guidelines on its website.

DROPBOXES

Reuters also looked into multiple reports of movies ostensibly featuring wrongdoing with decline boxes.

An infamous version that was reported, as an example, claimed to show that there was a “fraudulent” recollection of mail-in-ballots in the L.A. Region, which were said to be invalid as a result of the fact that “they certainly were sent following Election Day.”This is incorrect based on what Reuters previously responded to ( in this information ). Sure, the ballots were voted on in November. 4. However, they were legitimate as they certainly were placed by voters before November. 3. This was in line with Colorado guidelines ( in this case ).

Advertisement

Another allegation disproved through Reuters concerned a resident of Pennsylvania who had been wrongly noted on the internet to be usually the one who “fraudulently” settled multiple ballots in a drop-box. However, the state clerk’s office has stated that since the state’s “specified agent,” he was legally throwing polls at disabled voters who had licensed the individual to cast their ballots. Similar principles come in devote different claims for individuals who cannot vote on their own ( here )

Recently, the idea of “stuffed” decline boxes was stated in a movie by traditional political commentator Dinesh D’Souza. Reuters, in a fact-checked report, The documentary fails to offer unique, verifiable proof that voters committed widespread fraud during this election. Reuters consulted professionals in election reliability and technology. Also, they couldn’t establish whether any evidence of security, geolocation, or other information presented could be credible signals of fraudulent activity.

DESTROYING BALLOTS?

Other movies Reuters discussed declare showing votes cast for a specific choice, of erased or destroyed.

Advertisement

An instance from Oklahoma involved ballots that were destroyed for their ruined (where voters mistakenly noted multiple choices in an election) and were not valid ballots to be extracted. Another movie that made the same declaration in Virginia Beach included taste ballots which were not the official votes.

Similar cases reported by Reuters can be found

ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES

Reuters also disproved various allegations of fraud in the voting method, blaming electronic voting devices and their service providers. The entire report can be obtained.

Advertisement

CLAIMS OF FRAUD AFTER 2020 ELECTION PROVEN TO BE FALSE

False assertions produced by the former U.S. Leader Donald Trump and his followers declaring widespread fraud in the voting method for the 2020 effects have already been rejected by the courts and state governments and officials of their government.

U.S. election safety officials have reported the election to be “the most protected in American history”. A former U.S. Lawyer, Basic William Barr, who had been the country’s most effective law enforcement formal under Leader Trump, claimed. 1st, 2020, he did not see any evidence that might modify the outcome of the elections.

Furthermore, federal and state judges trashed more than 50 lawsuits filed on behalf of Trump or his associates, accusing him of electoral fraud and other irregularities.

Advertisement

In Arizona in the state of Arizona, State Senate Leader Karen Fann is the Republican who had been usually the one to open the entranceway to perform the “complete forensic audit” of 2.1 million ballots cast in the Maricopa Region, claimed the total vote depends on the evaluation was consistent with the original effects from November. “The fact is reality. Figures are figures,” Fann stated throughout a Senate hearing concerning the review. The audit unveiled just minor variations that resulted in 99 votes for Biden and 261 fewer votes for Trump. “Those figures were shut, in just a several hundred.

This informative article was published through The Reuters Fact Check always a team. Please find out about our fact-checking work.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Santos steps down from home parts amid integrity issues   

Published

on

By

WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican Rep. George Santos of New York told GOP colleagues Thursday he's temporarily going down from his two congressional committees

Santos steps down from home parts amid integrity issues   

WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican Rep. George Santos of New York told GOP colleagues Thursday he’s temporarily going down from his two congressional committees, a move that comes amid several ethics’ issues and a day after he achieved with House Speaker Kevin McCarthy.  

Santos has confronted numerous requests for his resignation and is facing numerous investigations by prosecutors around his personal and plan finances and lies about his continued and family background.  

Advertisement

Santos was given to two reasonably low-profile sections, the House Committee on Small Business and the House Science, Space, and Engineering Committee.  

Rep. Tom Cole, R-Olka., said your decision was well-received from the GOP conference, saying “I think it was the correct thing to do and I was pleased with him for getting up and doing this.”  

McCarthy met with Santos on Wednesday evening but didn’t expose their conversation.  

Advertisement

“You’ll see,” McCarthy told reporters at the Capitol.  

Santos, meanwhile, said he would concern a record later in the day. Requested whether he was contemplating resigning, Santos replied, “No, I am not.”  

Santos steps down from home parts amid integrity issues   

The issues encompassing Santos go beyond his misrepresentations to voters, but in addition whether his congressional plan used regulations in their conforming to the Federal Election Commission. There have been lingering issues about irregularities in his plan committee’s economic reports and the source of Santos ‘wealth.  

Advertisement

If Santos ‘plan is located to own purposefully and willfully made any “materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent record or representation” on their paperwork, it may potentially experience offender charges, the FEC said in a letter to the plan last week.  

Republicans explained your decision by Santos to temporarily step down from the 2 House sections as voluntary. Rep. Roger Williams, the chairman of the House Committee on Small Business, said he was surprised.  

“Underneath line is that he’s selected to be down committees till his condition gets handled at a level that he’s more comfortable with,” Williams said.  

Advertisement

Santo’s probe wanted by Democrats around House ethics  

WASHINGTON (AP) — The House Integrity Committee was requested Thursday to investigate Rep. George Santos, the newly-elected Republican from New York who has accepted to lying about his work experience, college training, and family history, and now encounters issues about his plan economic disclosures.  

Two Democrats requested the probe, saying Santos “has failed to uphold the strength estimated of people of the House of Representatives.”  

In a letter to the Integrity Committee, Democratic Reps. Ritchie Torres and Dan Goldman, equally of New York, said Santos also failed to file “reasonable, precise and complete” economic disclosure reports as expected by law. They said the words Santos did file are “thin and perplexing.” They requested the section to investigate and “take ideal action the moment possible.”  

Advertisement

Some Democratic leaders said Santo ought to be expelled from the House.  

A spokesperson for Santos didn’t instantly respond to a request for comment.  

Santos has accepted to fabricating a few aspects of his living history and experience in his work for the House seat he won in November, supporting to offer Republicans a thin majority. Nonetheless, the newly elected lawmaker was sworn into the company the other day along with other people of the House.  

Advertisement

Republican leaders have declined to take action against Santos, whose election served to provide them with a 222-seat hang on the House majority. Santos was also elected the other day in the raucous balloting to produce GOP leader Kevin McCarthy as the House speaker.  

Majority Leader Steve Scalise said Thursday the problem has been “handled internally” by Republicans.  

“There were issues by what we had seen,” said Scalise, R-La. “Therefore, we’re going to need to take a seat and keep in touch with him about it.”  

Advertisement

Santos accepted a couple of weeks before he lied about his work experience and college training during his effective plan for a seat in the U.S. House.  

Santos had also said he had labored for Citigroup and Goldman Sachs, but neither business may find any records verifying that.  

In an interview with the New York Article, Santos said: “My sins here are embellishing my resume. I’m sorry.”  

Advertisement

He also explained he never claimed to be Jewish following the Jewish National site The Forward had questioned a claim on Santos ‘plan site that his grandparents “fled Jewish persecution in, settled in Belgium, and again fled persecution during WWII.”  

Democrats were scathing in their criticism.  

“Kevin McCarthy owns George Santos, secure stop and barrel,” said Rep. Pete Aguilar of Colorado, the chairman of the House Democratic caucus. “It’s the reason he was seated, to offer George Santos that ability to vote for Kevin McCarthy. Therefore, let us contact that just what it is. There ought to be repercussions.”  

Advertisement

It’s unclear the Integrity Committee’s next steps. As part of the new House rules package, any member of the general public is now able to file issues against lawmakers. Integrity advocates have informed other new rules will weaken the committee’s staff and membership.  

The committee hasn’t fully shaped yet as House Republicans come in the middle of selecting committee seats, and people and creating the new Congress.  

Democrats have now been critical of Santos as well as McCarthy for his efforts to oust three Democratic lawmakers from committee jobs while at once appointing Santos, who has lied therefore completely to his constituents about his background.  

Advertisement

“The hypocrisy only holds you by the throat,” said Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif. “This is a Republican audio who is seating an individual fraud, George Santos, on committees, a serial fabricator about all of his existence.”  

McCarthy clogged Schiff and Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif, from being re-appointed to the House Lasting Choose Committee on Intelligence, however, they will be able to offer on other committees. He’s also focused on removing Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., from serving on the House Committee on International Affairs, however, such a move could come to the full House for a vote, wherever undoubtedly Democrats could renew issues concerning the propriety of allowing Santos to sit on committees as their people are being removed.  

McCarthy has little margin for the mistake if he decides to follow her expulsion for remarks McCarthy has called antisemitic regarding Israel. Soon after Omar found its way to Congress in 2019, the House permitted a resolution condemning antisemitism and other styles of bigotry — without mentioning her by name — after she made remarks that critics said accused Israel proponents of getting double allegiances.  

Advertisement

At least two Republicans have said they won’t vote for Omar’s removal from the foreign affairs panel. They said Democrats were incorrect in removing Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., and John Gosar, R-Ariz., from their committees 2 yrs. ago. And Republicans were building a similar error when it came to Omar.  

“Two errors don’t produce a right,” said Rep. Victoria Spartz, R-Ind., putting, “Speaker McCarthy wants to prevent ‘bread and circuses ‘in Congress and start governing for a change.” 

“It’s just improper,” said Rep. Ken Buck, R-Colo.“Let us stop damaging that place. Let us allow it to be better. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

A TikToker claimed he won an merit if you are the first ever to Google an obscure phrase.

Published

on

By

A TikToker said he won an award for being the first to Google an obscure phrase. The elaborate hoax reached millions and sparked a copycat trend.

A TikToker said he won an award for being the first to Google an obscure phrase. The elaborate hoax reached millions and sparked a copycat trend. 

  • A TikToker went viral after he claimed to win an award from Google after searching a unique phrase. 
  • TikTokers and viewers said they tried searching bizarre phrases in an attempt to win their own. 
  • The creator behind the account confirmed with Insider the award doesn’t exist. 

A TikToker created a fake trophy and claimed Google had sent it to him for being the first person to search for an obscure phrase, tricking viewers into entering increasingly bizarre search terms in an attempt to win one of their own. 

  On September 9, 2022, a 33-year-old from North Florida who goes by the handle @legbootlegit on TikTok and asked Insider to refer to himself only as Justin due to privacy concerns, uploaded a video with the on-screen caption, “I got a package in the mail from Google!” 

  In the 13-second clip, which received over 3.1 million views, a hand could be seen opening a box and pulling out a small glass trophy with the Google logo and an inscription that read, “First person to Google the phrase ‘is it legal to take pigeons from the park for free.’” 

Advertisement

  The next day, Justin shared a follow-up video that was viewed 3 million times, with the on-screen caption “I got another!!” which showed a second award being placed next to the first on a shelf. The inscription on the new edition said he was the first to search the term “fun or profitable things to do with 237 pigeons.” 

 But the millions of people who watched the videos were being duped — the award was completely made up as part of an elaborate piece of “performance art,” the creator said. 

  Not everyone believed Justin, but his videos sparked a trend regardless 

Combined, the videos received over 2,500 comments, many of which speculated whether the award was authentic. “Are these real?” a comment read with over 2,700 likes. “There’s no way I haven’t earned one of these,” a comment with over 3,600 likes read. 

Advertisement

Other comments questioned what happened when Justin searched the term, how he was notified by Google about the news, and how the company knew his home address. 

Justin’s responses were non-committal, often suggesting viewers were right to question his story. Still, Justin uploaded another video on January 19 which appeared to show him filming a laptop screen as he searched for a new phrase.  

In the clip, which was viewed 2.6 million times, a message with the heading “Congratulations!” appeared to pop up on the screen, which featured a graphic of confetti falling across the text, “You were the first to search for this phrase” and “we will send your award to the home address linked to your Google Maps profile.” 

Advertisement

Soon after, multiple TikTok users started documenting their attempts to win an award from Google for a unique search. On January 22, a user who goes by @nathantriska uploaded a video viewed over 4.4 million times, where he typed “why did my dog give birth last night while sitting on a picture of James Charles around 6:08 pm central time” into Google.  

In a similar video, which received over 8.5 million views, a user who goes by @connorhessee appeared to search the term, “how to explain to your dog that your mental health is unstable and you cannot buy them the purple shirt they saw in a Walmart clearance section magazine.” 

Of course, neither search term led to a notification from Google.  

Advertisement

Justin said the hoax was part of his performance art 

Justin said

Justin, who described his videos as “performance art riffing on consumerism and pop culture,” told Insider via an email exchange that the award was completely fake. A spokesperson for Google confirmed to Insider the award “does not currently exist” and said 15% of the searches they see every day are new.  

Justin’s account is known for creating parody products, including a physical Twitter blue check, typo-filled valentines’ cards, and fake action figures. He said he came up with the fake award while discussing “various hair-brained ideas” with his brother. 

“One of us suggested a nice award in the style of corporate achievement, but for something silly… like searching up a phrase on Google,” he told  

Advertisement

“It does seem as though a high percentage of viewers believed the concept, especially on my latest video where I showed the popup on my computer screen,” Justin said. “Most of the comments were from people sharing their bizarre search queries which somehow failed to produce any award notification.” 

Justin said

  To achieve the effect of the Google pop-up notification, Justin said he used “JavaScript and browser dev tools” and “injected some code into a local copy of a Google script to simulate an award notification.”    

Justin said he enjoys hearing from people who can’t tell if his work is satire or real, but said he especially loves it “when viewers DO catch on and play along with the joke.” He told Insider, “They are my kind of people.” 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Are you interested in learning more information about HAARP?

Published

on

By

HAARP

Are you interested in learning more information about HAARP? Are you curious about what scientists know about the Ionosphere of Earth, which is the space between Earth’s lower atmosphere and air vacuum?

HAARP The HAARP University of Alaska Fairbanks High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program facility located in Gakona will hold an open house on the weekend of the 27th of August. The event provides participants with the opportunity of the general public to view the world-class research facility in person and learn more about the scientific questions that the facility is seeking to address. HAARP draws researchers from universities, government as well as the private sector.

HAARP

A self-guided 90-minute timed entry tour will include the following aspects:

Advertisement

* Control room for HAARP

* History and science exhibits

The power plant which includes the five generators that were used in the research

Advertisement

* Transmitters as well as The 33-acre array of antennas

* Aircraft surveillance radar

*Ionosonde is a radar that monitors the health of the Ionosphere

Advertisement

* Radiometer is a device that measures radio frequency in cosmic space.

* Optical equipment domes

The University of Alaska Fairbanks acquired HAARP’s equipment for research from the Air Force in August 2015 through an agreement for education. HAARP is a part of the UAF Geophysical Institute that operates HAARP through a collaborative arrangement for research and development.

Advertisement

The tour is free. However, the number of tickets available for the open space is restricted. To receive a free ticket, go to the ticketing webpage on HAARP’s website at

The time slots can be accessed at 9 a.m., 10:30 a.m. and 12 p.m., and 1:30 p.m.

Parking is restricted. Vehicles are limited to a maximum length of 36 feet. The maximum width is 9 feet, and the maximum height of 10 feet.

Advertisement

HAARP can be found at Gakona in Gakona, at the miles 11.3 Tok Cutoff, 26 miles to the north of Glennallen. This is about 135 miles away from Delta Junction.

HAARP users must wear masks inside at all times and outdoors when distances of 6 feet are not maintained.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending