Connect with us

Technology

Tech plant that removes harmful emissions cleans the air without costing Earth?

Published

on

Tech plant that removes harmful emissions cleans the air without costing Earth?

Carbon Engineering and Occidental Petroleum’s subsidiary 1PointFive revealed plans to construct 70 direct capture of air (DAC) plants in 2035, each of which will capture up to 1 million tons of CO2 annually. The first plant is expected to be operational by the end of 2024.

These plants may capture less than 0.2 percent of 2021’s total carbon dioxide emission if built. However, we will likely require much more to stop massive climate change. According to one estimate, it could be necessary to construct more than 1500 plants, each on 1 million tonnes, each year from 2030 to 2050.

Advertisement

We must also take in emissions from plants located in sectors that are difficult to regulate, such as cement and steel.

The figures here might be simpler to grasp. They are a bit more straightforward. International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that more than 1 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide must be captured annually by 2030 to have a good chance of reaching Net Zero by 2050, which requires a significant increase from the current 40 million tonnes capacity.

If that goal is met, it will end emissions of 5200 industrial facilities across the globe, which the IEA claims releases more than 1 million tonnes of carbon dioxide yearly. What amount of energy is likely to be needed, however? The answer is simple it will depend.

Advertisement

There’s such a wide variety of sources of carbon dioxide from various sectors and kinds of power plants that various technologies could be required for different purposes. In all cases, an expansion of supply chains for sorbents will be necessary.

The most popular method to extract CO2 from flue gas emissions post-combustion is through chemical absorption using amine solvents. Removing carbon dioxide in the solvent demands heat, but the quantity required can determine the viability economics of a method.

Monoethanolamine (MEA) is the most frequently used amine solvent to capture carbon. The reported energy usage for solvent regeneration is about one MWh (3.7GJ) per ton of carbon dioxide captured – enough energy to power an average UK home for 24 hours.

Advertisement

Innovative technologies are bringing this down to around 722kWh/tonne, according to the energy analytics company Thundersaid Energy analysis. It’s unclear whether the solutions for solvents are ready to be used in commercial operations, as claimed by the company’s founder Rob West.

A force to be good

Estimating the energy required for creating sufficient solvent (or solid sorbents) is challenging since the details of the amount of solvent utilized and reused during capture are sensitive to commercial. Manufacturing MEA could require about 800kWh per tonne.

Norwegian Climate foundation Bellona estimates the waste of the typical one million-tonne manufacturing plant to be between 100 and 300 tonnes annually, which implies as much as 240MWh might be needed for the replenishment of solvent each year.

Advertisement

Another non-trivial source of power is compression. This is necessary if carbon dioxide is intended to travel or be injected underground. In the majority of work I’ve observed, the regeneration process is carried out the pressure of atmospheric pressure

because once you have an enclosed vessel that is pressurized, it gets more complicated and costly, according to Hannah Chalmers at the University of Edinburgh. “You can’t expect something for nothing with thermodynamics.’

Life cycle studies put the energy needed for compression at the rate of 111kWh/tonne of carbon dioxide, and the energy required for injecting the gas in a well is 7kWh/tonne.

Advertisement

If we take the IEA’s 2030 goal of capturing one billion tons of carbon dioxide from industrial sources and assuming that the best available solvents for capturing, compressing, and injecting energies alone suggest an optimum of 840TWh is required. This is equivalent to 5.2 percent of projected global renewable energy generation in 2030, based on current commitments.

MOFs’ moment?

In the UK, the Drax power station is creating negative emission technology that uses woody biomass as a substitute for gas and coal-powered units. It has also experimented with a range of carbon capture technology.

The latest partner to join the project is Promethean Particles. The company uses a form called metal-organic framework (MOF). They have a vast surface area that can be adjusted to have a high degree of specificity for carbon dioxide.

Advertisement

Regarding energy requirements, there aren’t any solid chemical bonds to break to release carbon dioxide, so temperatures of 80 to 100 degC can be employed. This implies that Prometheans can use waste heat to power the process.

It’s that part that has Drax excited enough to go on this journey with Promethean,’ said the manager of business development, Chris Simmons. Even with the waste heat out, there are early indications that the energy needed to eliminate carbon dioxide is approximately 527 kWh/tonne, nearly half of the amine technology. In theory, using waste heat could reduce energy consumption to 40%, but it’s still very early days, warns Simmons.

Tech plant that removes harmful emissions cleans the air without costing Earth?

The quantity of sorbent needed implies that scaling up MOF production is vital for carbon capture and storage if it will be realized in the way that was planned. Canadian company Svante has worked with BASF to increase the production of its MOF sorbent developed for CCS in hydrogen and cement plants.

Advertisement

The company claims that the amount of sorbent needed at the average cement plant will be approximately 200 tonnes. Promethean’s continuous-flow technology allows MOFs to be produced more efficiently and with more efficient rates than the batch process.

The durability of MOF sorbents compared to other solid sorbents isn’t yet known. The fact that there aren’t any chemical reactions in the carbon capture process with MOFs implies that the structure won’t be affected. However, Promethean is working to determine the effects of impurities such as nitrous and sulfur oxides.

Inhaling the air

The process of capturing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, when it’s only 0.04 percent of the atmosphere, is a different process than taking it out of industrial flue gases, whose concentrations range from 4 to percent. Therefore, direct air capture (DAC) is still in its infancy. Only There are currently 18 facilities operating with a combined capacity of 10,000 tonnes per year.

Advertisement

The largest plant was inaugurated 2021 in 2021 by a Swiss pioneer and is now collecting the equivalent of 4000 tons of carbon dioxide each year. The gas is stored by injecting it into the water underground, where it can react with the basaltic rock beneath this plant in Iceland and form carbonate minerals. Carbon Engineering’s first facility is scheduled to be constructed at the US Permian Basin in the southern part of the US. The carbon dioxide gathered can be used to create synthetic fuels and to improve oil recovery.

The chemical looping involves fans pulling air over contactors with the mixture of potassium hydroxide that flows across them. The carbon dioxide present in the air reacts with potassium hydroxide and forms carbonate salt. The process of liberating carbon dioxide requires the separation of the salt into pellets that are then heated during an extremely high-temperature calcination process which is the energy-intensive part of the process. In 2018, David Keith, one of the company’s founders, wrote an extensive analysis of the power required by the various steps.

The energy required totaled 2.4MWh/tonne of carbon dioxide. This is with natural gas providing all energy and heat demands. The plant also captures four80,000 tons of carbon dioxide emitted by the gas power plant that provides the energy.

Advertisement

Energy demand fell to 1.8MWh/tonne if the calciner by itself was powered by gas. It would rise further to 1.5MWh if the entire process were driven by electric power. For those processes, a million tonnes plant entirely powered by electricity would need 1.53TWh/year, which is 1.2 percent of the UK’s renewable energy generation in the year before. However, Carbon Engineering and 1PointFive intend to design standardized modular designs that can be mass-produced and enable rapid implementation of technology advancements to reduce future costs.

Noah McQueen, head of research at the carbon capture firm Heirloom The company’s head of research, Noah McQueen, has stated that the electricity and heat needs of the DAC plant are comparable to the requirements of a refinery for petroleum. In the US, the facilities consume around 880 TWh of energy annually. He estimates that distributing the power into DAC could mean that 370 million tons of carbon dioxide can be captured annually – close to one percent of all global emissions.

Selecting sorbents

The rate of recovery for sorbent or solvents and duration affect the amount of energy required. Suppose the scale-up of direct air capture is possible will depend on the materials’ specifications. Several researchers have conducted life cycle evaluations of DAC techniques. However, the results aren’t sure as the data is built on technologies that are not yet in scale, and firms are incredibly cautious about the precise details of the material they’re employing.

Advertisement

Sarah Deutz, group leader in the field of energy Systems Engineering at RWTH Aachen University, Germany, has conducted life cycle analyses using proprietary information, which is based on the operation of its modular plant in Switzerland and Iceland. The study’s focus was the plants’ carbon footprints, which use various energy mixes.

‘ system utilizes a solid sorbent made of amine. The sorbent is regenerated, and carbon dioxide is removed by applying low-temperature heat and a moderate vacuum. As with Carbon Engineering, its process involves the energy of blowing air over the contactors.

To evaluate Climeworks’s process, Deutz chose six promising Adsorbents, including some that have tried and calculated the amount of energy needed for their production and disposal, assuming that they recycle at 95. The energy requirements varied between 39 and 186 kWh per tonne of carbon dioxide.

Advertisement

In addition to solid sorbents apart from solid sorbents, a DAC plant will require large amounts of other materials – like cement and steel, which require energy to make. For the current plant, she estimated that the cost of foundation space and collectors, the processing unit, and spare components would add 44kWh/tonne of carbon dioxide to the plant’s energy costs. Recycling all copper, aluminum, and steel could cut costs by two-thirds, bringing them down to 14.4 kWh/tonne of carbon dioxide.

When considering all demands on resources for the plant, it would consume the equivalent of 4MWh per tonne of carbon dioxide. However, incorporating heat pumps could reduce the carbon dioxide consumption to around 2MWh/tonne.

A study of optimization assumptions (including the reduction of 60% in the sorbent requirement) suggests that the facility with an annual capacity of 100,000 tonnes will require about 1.1MWh/tonne in carbon dioxide captured.

Advertisement

Achieving a 1% reduction in global emissions (Climeworks’s goal) would require deploying 3683 of these plants. Taking the best case (heat pump) scenario would require 409 TWh of energy. The IEA estimates that (based on the current commitments) in 2030, the electricity generated by renewable sources will reach 15,917 TWh which means operating DAC at this level will require 2.5 percent of the renewable generation.

Deutz also examined the requirements for materials to reach the scale needed to achieve this and concluded that for all the materials (except that sorbent), less than one percent of the predicted market production by 2030 is required. The situation would be different if we had to construct 1500 plants ten times the size each year from 2030 to 2030 or 2050. One thousand five hundred plants would need greater renewable power than predicted to be produced in 2030.

Cost reductions

Advertisement

Mahdi Fasihi, a researcher at LUT University in Finland who has also modeled the energy consumption for DAC systems, says there are various possibilities to bring these costs down.

Industrial heat pumps that are currently in development could offer greater temperatures. Co-siting DAC with other industrial processes like producing synthetic fuels could also enable it to take advantage of wasted heat. The electrolyzer industry is moving towards electrolysis at high pressure, which generates temperatures that can be used directly in the current low-temperature DAC techniques, eliminating the requirement for heat pumps. In the meantime, companies are trying to reduce the temperature at which regeneration occurs during the process of capture, and, in the end, it is possible that a heat pump will not be required at all.

But a balance needs to be found – co-sitting DAC plants close to geologic storage, like has tried, will reduce transport costs. It’s an optimization issue, Fasihi says. There are many instances in which locating the DAC plant near the source of heat or electricity at a low cost would be beneficial, even if it increases additional costs, as heating is an essential component to the cost.’

Advertisement

With this in mind, are partnering with Canadian CCS specialist Svante. The co-location of its DAC plants with CCS power plants might enable to the utilization of waste heat to create synthetic fuels using captured carbon dioxide. is developing a US Department of Energy-funded project that will combine Svante’s MOF sorbent with its modular systems on an energy generation facility for renewables in California.

“In the end,” says Deutz, direct air capture isn’t the silver bullet because we’ll need lots of energy to achieve it. However, the positive side is that we can reduce required emissions quickly in the coming decade.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. eugeniaobryan49

    June 22, 2022 at 11:33 pm

    Remarkable things here. I am very happy to look your article. Thank you so much and I am taking a look ahead to touch you. Will you please drop me a mail?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Technology

DXC Technology linked with individual equity takeover talks

Published

on

dxc

The cloud has permanently transformed infrastructure companies’ landscape – only ask IBM, HPE, CSC, and Atos

IT industry DXC Technology has hired consultants to help the elderly administration study a takeover bid.

Advertisement

Approximately states Bloomberg cited loquacious sources near the subject that obviously requested to keep anonymous. At least one individual equity suitor is understood to be in the frame, and the term of the interest triggered DXC’s share cost to spike more than 9 percent.

dxc

We’ve requested the organization to comment.

This isn’t the first time DXC was associated with takeover talks following, another shapeshifting infrastructure companies service, approaching its US-based rival in January 2021 to become listed on forces.  categorized this as a “potential pleasant transaction”; nonetheless, it didn’t eventually happen.

Advertisement

During the time, DXC printed the provide, considered to be in the location of $10 million, as “inferior and missing certainty in light of the worth the board feels DXC can produce on a standalone basis by executing our transformation journey.”

DXC was forged in the shoot of a merger between two striving corporations, CSC and HPE Enterprise Services, and they came together in 2017 to improve economies of scale in a part of the technology market which was being decimated by the cloud as enterprises needed another consider the way they digest technology.

The strategy taken by the first administration group at DXC was to cut fees quicker than profits went off; this involved property consolidation, including data center place, and unrelenting redundancy times for the team on the infrastructure companies’ side. Morale internally slumped among some employees.

Advertisement

A brand new exec group light emitting diode by Mike Salvino came on board in 2019 and is still trying to change the ship.

  • shares rebound quickly as the industry decides to get DXC is probably not valuable.
  • Franken-firm DXC Technology is born nowadays, and the fun begins…
  • Mike drop, DXC-ya later! Lawrie immediately ejects as CEO of IT outsourcing massive.
  • CEO resigns following board proposes splitting the organization

Revenue of $24.55 million in fiscal 2018 had dropped to $16.26bn in fiscal 2022, and the organization has reported both fair gains and high losses in those years.

DXC is not alone in its problems: IBM’s Worldwide Technology Services team recently suffered the same fate and decided to spin the business into an individually traded entity, Kyndryl. Now infrastructure companies no more consider Huge Blue’s revenue growth. And in 2010, going through the same process, spitting out its quicker growing and suffering corporations into two split organizations.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Technology

Dell XPS 15 (2020) review: new design, familiar problems

Published

on

Dell XPS 15 (2020) review: new design, familiar problems

New look with everyday highs, expected lows

The Dell XPS 15 has finally received a fresh look after years of using the same stale, heavy chassis. The redesign is similar to that of the XPS 13 earlier this year. However, the same caveats apply. Although Dell’s changes to the machine may not seem significant, they make it feel like an upgrade.

Advertisement

The XPS 15 base model starts at $1299 and comes with a Core i5-10300H processor, 8GB RAM, a 256GB SSD, and Intel UHD graphics. This model is great for browsing, but the i7 will be your best choice if you require any computing power.

Currently, the XPS can be maxed out with a Core i7-1075H, 64GB RAM, and a 3840 x 2240 touchscreen. A 2TB SSD is available for $2,988. Although Dell claims there will be an i9 option in the future, I doubt they would recommend them to most customers. They will be more expensive, and I find it difficult to believe that a thin product can use such a powerful processor without burning itself.

Dell XPS 15 (2020) review: new design, familiar problems

THE GOOD

  • Excellent 16:10 display
  • Design upgrade: Upgraded bezel-free chassis
  • Excellent keyboard and touchpad
  • Full-size SD Card Reader

THE BAD

  • Battery life is below average
  • Loud fans with loads
  • Hot runs

A midrange model priced at $2,253 was tested for performance issues and bloatware. It comes with a Core i7-1075H, 16GB RAM (DDR4), a touchscreen, and a 512GB SSD. This configuration is suitable for most people. However, you need to know what storage you require. If you have 512GB of space, you might be able to fill it quickly with $100 more.

The most apparent changes are the bezels. The new XPS is equipped with the latest Dell Infinity Edge four-sided display. It has skinny bezels. It seems to stretch from one end to the other. It feels almost like you are looking at an OLED TV. The new laptop’s screen is 5 percent larger than its predecessor’s and has a 92.9 percent screen-to-body ratio.

Advertisement

Last year’s XPS 15 had a thick bottom bezel with a large Dell logo. That’s gone. It’s gone. It gives you a premium look (I got significant 2015 Inspiron vibes when I used the old bezel) and more screens to work with.

The XPS 15’s 16:10 aspect ratio is another excellent addition. Corning Gorilla Glass 6 is used to make the touchscreen. It has a 3840 x 2400, one of the highest resolutions on a consumer laptop. It’s far superior to 16:9. It was easy to use several windows and apps without zooming in or out. I could also stack hundreds of Edge and Chrome tabs without feeling cramped.

The new XPS 15 weighs in at 4.5 pounds, 13.6 x 9.1 x 0.7 inches, and is slightly lighter than last year’s model. It is 5.5 percent smaller. It is also slightly smaller (but heavier than the 16-inch MacBook Pro at 4.3 pounds, 9.8 x 0.88 inches) and smaller than the Razer Blade 15, which weighs in at 14 x 9.3×0.8 inches.

Advertisement

Dell also installed speaker grilles on both sides of the keyboard. There are two tweeters at the base. Waves MaxxAudio Pro is preinstalled on the XPS. This driver allows you to enable 3D audio or toggle between presets. The 3D feature made music sound great.

Accept to Continue: Dell XPS 15, 2020

Dell XPS 15 (2020) review: new design, familiar problems

Each intelligent device requires that you agree to specific terms and conditions before it can be used. These are contracts that nobody reads. We are unable to review and analyze all of these agreements. We counted how many times we had to click “agree” to use the devices. These are agreements that most people don’t read and can’t negotiate.

You must agree to these conditions before you can use the Dell XPS 15:

Advertisement
  • Request for your region
  • Request for your keyboard layout
  • Windows 10 License Agreement
  • Microsoft account
  • PIN
  • Support and Protection from Dell

You can also answer the following questions yes or no:

  • Wi-Fi
  • Windows Hello Face and Fingerprint Recognition
  • Activity history
  • Syncing Android phones
  • OneDrive Backup
  • Office 365
  • Cortana
  • Privacy settings (speech Recognition, location, Find My Device sharing diagnostic data, typing, inking, and tailored experience, Advertising ID)
  • McAfee security subscription

Dell XPS 15 (2020) review: new design, familiar problems

Final tally:

There are six mandatory and nine optional agreements for the XPS 15 keyboards and touchpads. They have been my favorite peripherals on my laptops, and Dell has improved both. The glass touchpad’s size (5.9×3.5 inches) has increased by 62 percent. It is as easy and smooth to click as ever. The keycaps are 9.75% larger than last year’s, which is a noticeable improvement. Keys have 1.3mm travel and are quick. I could maintain a pace of over 140 words per hour with very high accuracy. This is much more than what I have achieved on my most recent laptop.

A few keys have changed: the left and right Arrows are more significant than last year’s model. They extend to the bottom Shift keys. The power button, which includes a fingerprint reader, is now located in the top-right corner. The infrared camera supports Windows Hello facial recognition if you don’t wish to use the fingerprint scanner.

Advertisement

The USB-A, HDMI, and power ports have been removed from the previous model. This new model has three USB-C, two of which are Thunderbolt 3 and can be charged with any of them), a full-sized SD-card reader, an audio jack, and a wedge lock slot. The XPS 15 now has connectivity levels comparable to the MacBook Pro, although the card reader is a bonus feature you won’t see daily. The XPS 15 ships with a USB C to USB A dongle to support older peripherals.

 Review of Dell XPS 15 2020 specifications

  • Processor: Intel Core i7-1075H
  • RAM: 16GB
  • Storage: 512GB PCIe 3 x4 SSD
  • Graphics: Nvidia GeForce 1650 Ti 4GB DDR6
  • Display: 15.6 inch touchscreen (3840×2400).
  • Ports: Two USB-C Thunderbolt 3 ports, one USB-C 3.0, one SD Card Reader v6.0, and one 3.5mm Audio Jack. One wedge-shaped lock slot.
  • Cameras: 720p
  • Weight: 4.5 pounds (2.05kg)
  • Dimensions: 13.57×9.06x 0.71 inches
  • Windows 10 Home operating system

This XPS 15’s main selling point is its redesign, but the processor and graphics card inside has been upgraded. The eight-core 10th Gen processor could multitask and have a healthy amount of RAM. I could run around 12 Chrome tabs, Spotify, YouTube videos, and some downloads in the background without any problems.

However, the Nvidia GTX 1650 Ti graphics card is mid-range. It is not the best gaming option unless you are willing to sacrifice some visuals. If you are looking for a 15-inch gaming system, there are better choices from MSI, Alienware, and Razer at or below this price — and if your heart desires a 14-inch, the excellent Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 is an option. The 1650 Ti is capable of assisting with creative work as well as other tasks that require high productivity.

The XPS 15 took four minutes to export a 33-second, five-minute video in Adobe Premiere Pro. This is comparable to the results from the Surface Book 3 (15-inch) with a 1660 Ti MaxQ and a quad-core Core i7-1065G7, and much faster than the 16-inch MacBook Pro (16-inch) with a Core i9-9990HK and Radeon Pro5500M graphics. It was slower than Gigabyte’s Aero 15 creator-focused Aero 15 with the identical i7-1075H and an RTX2070 Super Max Q, which completed the same task in two minutes and 42 seconds. Fortunately, while the XPS 15’s exterior has been improved, the problems with cooling and power consumption of the older model have not changed. When I multitask, the dual fans of my laptop can often be heard in my room. Premiere Pro was also affected by them. While the touchpad and palm rests were extraordinary, the keyboard and undercarriage got hot when the laptop was being used under load. Dell is still unable to cool the chips in such a thin chassis.

Advertisement

My first battery test was with the XPS 15 being my primary work vehicle. I used the Better Battery profile and the screen at 200 nits brightness. However, I only got between 2:30 to 3:30 of my required juice. I could troubleshoot the results with Dell and found the issue was McAfee, a 30-day trial that comes preinstalled on my system. After uninstalling McAfee, I saw results in five hours and 45 mins. The moral of the story is to uninstall McAfee. This raises the question of why Dell has crapware on its $2,000 laptop.

A system with an H series processor, discrete GPU, and high-resolution display can deliver six hours of battery life. It’s still a disappointing result when compared with some of the competitors. Tom Warren, my colleague, got seven hours from Microsoft’s Surface Book 3 15-inch with similar apps and browser loads. The 16-inch MacBook Pro can last around eight hours. The XPS did not perform as well as the Gigabyte Aero 15 with a faster GPU and OLED screen. I managed to get five hours and 22 mins out of the Aero 15 workstation using the same method.

(Chrome, however, is a very power-intensive app. However, switching to Microsoft Edge did not improve the situation. Although I was able to get eight hours from a standard 1080p video rundown, I doubt many people will buy a $2,300 laptop to loop movies.

Advertisement

The Dell XPS 15’s battery life, fans, and cooling are good points. These aren’t new problems for the Dell XPS 15. It’s disappointing that Dell hasn’t yet found a better thermal design or way to cool a faster GPU. Even for such a powerful machine, the battery life is not great.

The XPS line has always been famous due to its excellent keyboard and touchpad, premium build quality, and stunning screen. The XPS’s modern design features, such as the bezel-less display, wider keycaps, slim form factor, and expanded speakers, give it a chic, contemporary look and better user experience. This model is a perfect choice if you have wanted to purchase an XPS 15 but was waiting for Dell’s outdated design to be scrapped.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Technology

The best digital whiteboards: Which one should I buy? And seven recommended school use models, such as Lidl’s or productivity.

Published

on

The best digital whiteboards: Which one should I buy? And seven recommended school use models, such as Lidl's or productivity.

In classrooms, traditional chalk is mixed with pointers that let you erase quickly without leaving behind dust. There are screens where you can also launch content from your computer. The convenience, versatility, and variety of electronic digital whiteboards have made them famous. This electronic whiteboard buying guide will help you find a suitable model. We also offer a selection of suitable models for your needs and budget.

Guide to purchasing an electronic whiteboard

The umbrella term “electronic whiteboard” can be used to describe the broadest range of devices in terms of budget and features. The simplest devices are a digital smart notebook that is primarily for students. However, the most comprehensive ones look more like smart TVs with collaboration, teaching, and productivity apps. Both teachers and business people can utilize these.

Advertisement

We will attempt to cover both, but we will concentrate on the domestic sphere.

Screen size. The models for the entire class can be as large as 86 inches, emulating classic blackboards. However, individual models are between 8 and 15. If you are considering a large whiteboard in a room, be sure to check the image quality. Considering the diagonal, 4K resolution is a great option. They offer enough detail and sharpness to make it easy to identify the content.

Screen technology refers to panels and lighting systems. These will be familiar with monitors, tablets, and televisions, such as LCD or LED, with their respective variants. These technologies can reduce functions such as viewing quality or interaction (with a finger or a pointer)

Advertisement

You may be interested in an interactive whiteboard that can be used for drawing and other creative purposes. Look for one with pressure-sensitive screens so you can create strokes of different thicknesses.

The basic models are limited to offering a blank canvas that can be locked and erased. Still, the complete ones allow cross-device editing and collaboration synchronization through cloud services and are suitable for operating systems such as Windows, Linux, and Mac.

The most basic models do not offer connectivity, but they have Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and HDMI, allowing you to connect your computer with other peripherals.

Advertisement

Models that are recommended

The best digital whiteboards: Which one should I buy? And seven recommended school use models, such as Lidl's or productivity.

Easy, compact, and affordable Lidl electronic whiteboard (8.99 euro). It will come in three body colors and features an 8.5″ LCD screen with a pointer. The CR2025 type 1 AA battery powers it. It is straightforward to use. You can erase what you have written by pressing a button. The screen lock prevents you from losing your notes.

Electronic board Uses electronic boards to take notes, draw, and write on the go without using paper.

whiteboards

This Xiaomi Mi Lcd writing tablet (18.98 euro) is also designed for ease of use. It can grow up to 13.5 inches and comes with a magnetic pen. According to the manufacturer, it boasts an autonomy of 1 year and the ability to erase the screen 100 times per day. Lock button and delete button.

Advertisement

Xiaomi Mi LCD Writing Tablet 13.5 inch, 13.5 inch LCD Graphics Tablet. Pressure Sensitive Writing. Magnetic Style. Ultra Clear Writing. Low Power Consumption.

whiteboard

Richgv’s digital whiteboard (26 euro) is distinguished by its large diagonal and pressure-sensitive (15-inch LCD panel), two features that allow for drawing and doodling. You can delete or lock the key.

Rich 15-inch LCD Writing Tablet, Large-Sized Graphic Tablet, Digital Whiteboard, and Magnetic Whiteboard for Children and Adults (Blue).

Advertisement

The GUYUCOM model is 12.80 euros and features an 8.5-inch LCD panel. This allows you to write in colors, making it attractive for little ones to let go of their inhibitions and draw. It has a hole for hanging the pen, lock, and erase button.

GUYUCOM LCD Writing tablet, 8.5 Inch Electronic drawing board – Erasable & Reusable Graffiti Board (Blue)

The simplest models are for children, but this Optoma Creative Touch Serie 5 (150 euros) is for adults. It features a 65-inch touch screen with UltraHD 4K resolution that’s great for teaching.

Advertisement

This screen has Optoma TeamShare preinstalled. TapCast Pro can cast content wirelessly from the app using TapCast Pro. It also supports file management, screen recording, dual mode, and file management.

You’ll be able to use the included pen, which replicates the feel of a traditional whiteboard. It also has TUV low-intensity blue light certification, an ambient sensor, and a 50,000-hour life expectancy. It supports HDMI, VGA, and Ethernet ports, as well as USB ports.

This Benq RM5502K (1,689 Euro) is another advanced blackboard that can be used to teach. It has a 55-inch LED touch screen, 4K resolution, and allows for interaction and incredible detail.

Advertisement

Its assets include connecting with the EZWrite 5 cloud for synchronization with other devices facilitating collaboration, two pencils so two people can take notes, brush mode to allow creative uses and handwriting recognition, and speakers and microphones. Also, compatibility cross-platform with Windows and Mac, Linux, and Chrome.

Benq RM5502K LED 4K Ultra HD Touch Panel Interactive Flat Panel Black Built-in Processor Android 8.0

The Vibe interactive digital panel (2,419 euro) is for professionals who want a professional experience. It has a 55-inch panel with 4K UHD resolution and a 5ms response speed.

Advertisement

Viber is the interface. This whiteboard can be used with Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. It also allows up to four screen sharing. Easy installation and cloud service

Vibe Interactive Digital Display with Real-Time Interactive for All-in-One Computer and Smart Whiteboards for Business, Classroom, and Classroom. 55″ 4K Uhd Touch Screen (No Stand)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending