Connect with us

Health

“We had to work with partners to help them see mental health as a medical need.”

Published

on

Texas expert on public safety discusses how to improve response to behavioral health emergencies.

B.J. She has decades of experience in public safety and health and specializes in the intersection between health and justice systems. Her specialization is in emergency response models.

Advertisement

Multi-Disciplinary Response Teams was one of the models Wagner created. Dallas first piloted it in 2018. Multi-Disciplinary Response Teams is a community paramedicine model that focuses on health-first approaches to emergencies involving people with mental or substance use disorders. It includes licensed paramedics, paramedics, and specialized law enforcement officers involved in the care and social needs of those affected.

This interview was edited to be more transparent and extended.

Q1: Could you please tell us about the creation of Multi-Disciplinary Response Teams by you and your team?

A: We started by speaking to over 500 officers and holding focus groups throughout Dallas County. We asked them their most pressing needs when responding to a mental emergency. We heard it repeatedly: they don’t have access to medical care.

Advertisement

Paramedics, however, stated that they could not provide medical care because sometimes, the situation is not safe. Paramedics and law enforcement officers stress the inability to immediately provide mental health care. It was, therefore, essential to include the healthcare clinician in the solution.

We began to think about mental health emergencies and how they develop at their most crucial stages. These three professions, paramedics and psychologists, were combined to ensure that anyone at risk of becoming a danger to the public or who can be unpredictable and has a mental emergency can access treatment and services.

The program was piloted in Dallas, and it was a huge success. The program was then expanded to other parts of the state.

Advertisement

Q2: What were the initial reactions of stakeholders, such as paramedics and law enforcement personnel, community health specialists, and community leaders?

A: There was some resistance. A few things were said. This can be costly, especially for small businesses. Communities. This program brings together a three-unit team of licensed paramedics, health professionals, and police officers to handle mental health emergencies. The cost will be a problem when we consider it from a staffing standpoint. We also hear from these three professions that they don’t all need to be there simultaneously.

The community was not the only one that reacted to the situation. Paramedics were not used to responding to mental health emergencies. Law enforcement was also not used to being accompanied by civilians like health specialists to react to high volatility calls. It took a lot of convincing people to agree to do something different than a traditional crisis intervention team or a clinician and law enforcement officer responding to an emergency.

Q3: How did your culture change to gain buy-in?

A: Culture change doesn’t come overnight. About a year of planning was done in Dallas. We also spoke to professionals outside of law enforcement. Paramedics needed to be able to see mental health as a medical emergency. We worked with them. Also, we had to ensure that safety measures were in place to allow these teams to respond to high-public safety risks.

Advertisement

We then took the model to other parts of the state. This was a cultural shift in itself. To make the program more accessible to rural areas like Abilene, we had to reduce its Dallas identity.

Q4: How can the state and local governments help ensure that people with mental health emergencies are treated consistently?

A: I believe local governments are responsible for looking after their communities’ individual needs and ensuring a continuum in care. It is essential that community health specialists, local police officers, and hospitals are involved in these conversations and that all parties can communicate with each other.

I believe the state must make available resources to pay for personnel, vehicles, and other equipment to allow this health-based approach to work. A person in a mental health crisis should be able to access treatment at hospitals and treatment centers. They should also access other social services such as housing, substance abuse care, and trauma-informed support. State governments cannot dictate uniform service designs across the state. What may work in large urban areas may not work in small rural areas. However, the state must ensure that resources are available to all state residents.

Advertisement

Q5: Over the last few years, we’ve noticed a shift in discussing mental illness in this country. What are you proud of? And what can we improve upon?

A: We’re getting it right when we talk about mental health in a

health care framework. This is part of most people’s regular health insurance. When you go to your primary doctor, they will ask you some health screening questions. It’s not something we discuss anymore, nor is it something we discuss in separate conversations. The person-centered approach to health care delivery incorporates mental health care.

The debate about whether we need to have law enforcement or civilian response to a mental emergency is something we’ve been having for some time. It has escalated over the last year and a quarter. It’s encouraging to see communities start to discuss “and” instead of “or.” This includes law enforcement and civilian response. Paramedics and experts are also brought in to have a complete mental health emergency system compatible with the care continuum. We still have much work to do to include “and” in everyone’s conversations so that we don’t reduce the number of people experiencing a mental health emergency to the police. It is time to ask, “Why did law enforcement only go to this mental health emergency?”

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Health

Why you receives a commission to donate plasma, however now, not blood

Published

on

donate plasma

donate plasma and donating body are essentially the same: the access questionnaire, getting hooked up to and including the unit, and the dessert afterward. But in the US, there is a substantial crucial difference: one is an act of charity, and the other is an act of commerce. So why is it that you get compensated for donating plasma but not your body?

It’s a widespread belief that the Food and Drug Government bans paying for blood. It only claims body from compensated donors has to be marked that way. But hospitals won’t use it. In practice, no one gives for the body, said Mario Macis, an economist at the Johns Hopkins Carey Business School who has studied incentives for body donation. “Although it’s legitimate, it’s still regarded maybe not completely moral or honest to cover income to body donors.”

Advertisement

Why you get paid to donate plasma but not blood

Apart from the ickiness of handing out literal body income, the FDA is concerned that spending on donors would jeopardize the protection of the body supply. Nobody with a blood-borne disease is suitable to donate, but the company worries that donors might sit about their wellness or change behaviors if income were on the line.

The technology there’s not settled. However, the World Wellness Business sees it convincing enough that they decrease countries spending body donors. “Evidence reveals the significantly lower prevalence of transfusion-transmissible attacks among voluntary nonremunerated donors than among other types of donors,” their criticism in 2013 read.

The donated body is tested for diseases, anyway, but the FDA claims it wants these steps to be unnecessary safety actions, “like layers of an onion.”

Advertisement

Lcd donation — by which the body is drawn, plasma divided out, and then body cells and other parts set back into you — is often compensated. The FDA doesn’t require paid plasma donations to be labeled. This is because that plasma gathered in this manner never goes straight into another person. It’s broken into many different protein products that’ll become pharmaceuticals. On the way, these parts are refined to eliminate or kill any virus stowaways. “The chance of infection is inherently much lower,” said Dr. Christopher Stowell, who lately chaired the FDA’s Blood Products Advisory Committee. Whole red body cells are too sensitive to undergo the same processing as plasma.

And there is some evidence that paying for plasma certainly, causes more visitors to disguise their illness position or change behaviors. For example, the Government Accountability Company looked at California’s body versus plasma supply back in the 1990s and discovered that plasma had higher rates of HIV. You will find studies of desperate donors lying about diseases to donate for cash.

However, the sort of compensation matters. In a 2013 Research report, Macis and others discovered that benefits such as gift cards, coupons, and T-shirts often raised donations and did not find any effects on body safety. (The FDA doesn’t count blessings similar to this as cost, so long as they can not be easily converted into cash.) “Nonmonetary incentives do work,” Macis said. He thinks applying more of these motivators could help the United States control periodic body shortages.

Advertisement

Were you longing for greater than a T-shirt? Do not also consider selling a kidney. The National Organ Transplant Behave of 1984 managed to get illegal to fund organs. But in the 2011 situation Flynn v. Dish, the US Judge of Speaks for the Ninth Signal ruled that a particular way of bone marrow donation could be compensated.

Historically, bone marrow was gathered in a precise treatment, with a worthless hook caught straight into the pelvis. But in an even more popular strategy named peripheral body stem mobile apheresis, donors take medications that release the stem cells from their marrow within their blood. Chances are they donate the cells through a hook in the arm and an apheresis unit — a plasma donation.

Stores that acquire such cells spend around $800, but they haven’t seen fascination very much, the AP lately wrote. And the cells can not be refined like plasma. Therefore it’s cloudy what the chance could be from spending donors in this nascent market.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Health

pros and cons of being a travel radiology technologist

Published

on

pros and cons of being a travel radiology technologist

Are you a radiologic technologist trying to decide if a traveling position is correct for you? Whenever you’re considering a new career move, it’s always a good idea to start with a comparison of the pros and cons. There are many great benefits to travel radiology jobs, but just like any other job, it may not be for everyone. We’ve compiled a quick list of some of the benefits and drawbacks of a career as a traveling radiology technologist.

Pros of Being a Traveling Radiologic Technologist

·       Combine Your Love of Travel with Your Job

One of the main reasons people consider becoming a traveling radiologic technologist is the ability to travel and work simultaneously. If you’re a radiographer who loves to travel, this may be your ideal job opportunity. Experience new and exciting cities while earning a steady paycheck. Each new temporary contract can take you to a place you’ve never been.

Advertisement

·       More Job Opportunities

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the future demand for radiologic technologists will be intense. But not every city has the same level of opportunity. If radiology technician jobs are hard to come by in your region, being a traveling radiographer can open new opportunities. Job placement agencies are well-connected to hospitals all around the country and can help you find radiologic technologist jobs you might not have found on your own.

·       Earn More Money

Traveling radiologic technologists often earn a better salary than those working in permanent positions. Pay varies by location and assignment, but most radiographers are paid a bit more since they are placed in high-demand areas. Plus, many staffing agencies provide contract completion bonuses, referral bonuses, and more that can increase their total earnings.

·       Free Housing

Since you’ll be traveling a lot, most job placement agencies will offer free housing or a tax-free housing stipend to cover living expenses. Both options allow traveling radiographers to keep even more of their paychecks.

Advertisement

Cons of Being a Travel Radiologic Technologist

Cons of Being a Travel Radiologic Technologist

·       Working in Unfamiliar Environments

While many people enjoy traveling, some don’t enjoy changing their working environment. If you like to stick to a standard routine on the job, constantly switching to new hospitals may not be your cup of tea. As a traveling radiologic technologist, you’ll need to be adaptable to new surroundings.

·       Changing Pay Rates

Each assignment as a radiologic technologist has the potential to offer a different salary. Therefore, adjusting for those who are used to a consistent rate of pay can be challenging. Financial planning is essential as income fluctuates and some bills remain constant. Fortunately, most assignments include housing, so that portion of your budget won’t have to be a concern.

·       Constantly Evolving Technology

When working as a radiologic technologist, you must get used to the high frequency with which equipment and technology are updated. You’ll have to occasionally improve your qualifications to keep up with new imaging equipment. This can be more challenging while on the road, significantly when each new assignment could feature new equipment you are unfamiliar with.

Advertisement

·       It Can Be lonely

Life on the road is sometimes lonely, so many traveling radiology technologists bring their family or pets to their assignments. Fortunately, if you work with an agency like LRS Healthcare, you can access your recruiter 24/7. So you’re never truly alone.

If you’ve decided that a career as a traveling radiologic technologist is a good fit, apply with LRS Healthcare today! As an industry leader, we work to connect you with some of the best radiologic technologist jobs around the country. LRS Healthcare can help you discover your dream job.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Health

How Much Does Biomat USA Pay for Plasma? + What Else to Know

Published

on

How Much Does Biomat USA Pay for Plasma? + What Else to Know

How Much Does Biomat USA Pay for Plasma?

Compensation for donors at Biomat USA is based on your location and how often you make a donation.

To give an idea of the amount of money to be paid, we contacted Biomat US branches across Illinois, Tennessee, and Arizona. We discovered that the median amount for new donors typically is between $40 and $75. Returning donors receive between $50 and $75.

Advertisement

Some places also have promotions with additional compensation for donations during a particular month or for referring new donors.

Because compensation is different in each case, you should contact Biomat USA at your nearest Biomat USA to find out the exact amount you’ll be able to get.

Please note that you can only give plasma two times within seven days, and you must allow at least 48 hours between donations. This means you can donate anywhere between 4 and 8 times per month. You can earn between $150 and $300 using a GRIFOLS pre-paid Visa debit card.

Advertisement

Donor Requirements & Process

How Much Does Biomat USA Pay for Plasma? + What Else to Know

Biomat America locations are managed by GRIFOLS and are governed by the same donor guidelines as the other GRIFOLS Donation centers.

  • At the minimum of 110 pounds (find out how you can get weighed free of charge)
  • It would be best if you had a minimum age of 18 to 69
  • Should be in good physical condition
  • You must show a valid photo ID (driver’s license or state ID, passport, and military ID), proof of address, and proof of your Social Security number; note that your name must be matched on these documents.

The process of donation consists of the following steps.

The first step is to check in and submit the documents you’ve listed earlier, as well as answer a survey about your medical history and health.

Then you’ll be given a health check-up, including an analysis of your blood and a review of your vital indicators.

Advertisement

If this is the first time you’ve donated (and about once per year after that), A specialist will perform an examination.

After you’ve completed all the health tests and have completed your donation, you’ll be able to complete it. Biomat USA will reimburse you after the appointment.

Alternatives

For more Plasma donation choices, check out our list of donation centers by region and the top-paying plasma donation facilities.

Advertisement

We also provide information on the policies for donation in Biotest, Interstate Blood Bank, KEDPLASMA, CSL Plasma, and BioLife to allow you to look up donor requirements and other information before deciding the most appropriate option for you.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending